The sixth, and last, fortnightly topic for the
research supervision course I am undertaking is the
conceptions of research which students and their supervisors have. Somehow half way through I strayed from the topic, into the area of student diversity:
What The Candidates Think
As part of the ANU
Information & Human Centred Computing group, I attend fortnightly research presentations (this week: “
Computer games for rehabilitation”).
In this area "research" is synonymous with "experimentation" using the
scientific method. Students do literature searches and build hardware,
but only as a precursor to experiments, where they carry out repeated
tests under controlled conditions using human subjects. Students are
expected to have already conducted such research as an undergraduate,
typically in Honours. Some are doing research into policy, but only
after proving themselves in experimental work.
Readings
Course Notes
"
HDR candidates" divides the topic into four:
The notes distinguish between those interested in research and those
interested in a qualification for career advancement. International
candidates are singled out as being typically motived by career
advancement. But this analysis of student motivations is not then linked
to practical outcomes.
The
research presented
suggests that about half of doctoral graduates go on to work in higher
education, but no split between administrative, teaching and research
positions is provided. The notes appear to be trying to obscure the fact
that most research graduates do not go on to a career in research.
The notes discuss common student misconceptions as to what research
is, such as only gathering data to support preconceived ideas and
suggests it is critical for a supervisor to discover if students hold
such misconceptions. But if such misconceptions are as common as
indicated, then I suggest the appropriate action is to have a formal
test for all students and then set work to correct the misconceptions.
This should not be left to some informal fireside chat between
supervisor and student.
The notes suggest that as well as supervisors, others will be
important to the student, such as librarians, technical support and lab
staff, family, friends and peers. The importance of written and oral
communication skills is emphasised.
The "
Ideas & tools" section of the notes references "
Life as a doctoral student - more than research" (
Oxford Learning Institute,
2011), which shows a page out of a student diary to emphasise that
university is about social as well as study activities. It suggests
these steps:
-
Building relationships
-
Learning to be proactive
-
Developing new skills and identities
-
Communicating one's research
-
Imagining a future beyond the doctorate
Perhaps the university could update this approach by making the student's e-journal part of the assessment.
The notes point out that about 14% of Australian doctoral candidates
are international students. The top three countries for international
PHDs in 2008 were: Malaysia, China and Indonesia. Also 36% of students
were part time for at least part of their program, with the proportion
of part time students increasing over time. The notes point out that
full-time candidates are more likely to complete, but the part-time
candidates who do complete do so in less time.
Oxford's "
Student diversity"
points out that UK Higher education institutions are subject to
legislation protecting against discrimination by age, race, sexual
orientation, religion and gender. Australian universities are subject to
similar legislation, including the
Disability Discrimination Act 1992 and are required to
anticipate
the requirements of their students. It is not lawful to wait for a
student to ask for special access. This principle was confirmed in the
case of "
Maguire v SOCOG 2000" (for which I was one of the
expert witnesses).
As a part-time coursework student I have faced considerable
impediments to study, where courses and administrative procedures have
been designed on the assumption that the typical student is on-campus,
full time, young, nimble and has good eyesight. It must be much more
difficult for a student from a remote part of Australia, or overseas,
who has work, family, religious or cultural commitments, which prevent
them studying to a fixed timetable and location. This contrasts with studies at an online university, which I found set up for a diverse student population.
Other Readings
Åkerlind (2008) point out that there is much less literature on
academics' experience of research, than of teaching. They point out that
the increasing emphasis on measurement and accountability of academic
research activity, in‐depth exploration of the ways in which academics
experience research, and of their underlying intentions in being a
researcher and undertaking research, become important.
Åkerlind (2008) examines ten
phenomenographic
studies using interviews of students and supervisors, mostly in
technology disciplines. Studies looked at the extent to which academic
value research in terms of contributing to goals of individual
researchers and the research team. In addition they looked at the
quality of the research, how it contributes to knowledge and is of
general benefit and solves practical problems.
The authors note a difference in outlook of those conducting research into research, in terms of
outcomes,
process, or
intentions.
They then conducted their own research of of 28 academics at an
"research‐intensive university in Australia" (most likely ANU). The
results were summarised as "Being a researcher as ...":
-
fulfilling academic requirements
-
establishing oneself in the field
-
developing oneself personally
-
enabling broader change
Bills (2007) investigated the questions:
what is research,
what is good research and
what qualities make a good researcher,
what makes a good research student and
why do research? Rather than interviews or surveys an
ethnomethodology,
with analysis of focus group discussion was applied. The major finding
of Bills (2007) was that it is the supervisor's own concepts of how
research is conducted (and in particular who is in charge), which can
cause problems for students, as much as the student's perceptions. Also
it is suggested that undertaking a research degree is largely a process
of socialisation into a discipline.
References
Bills, D. (2007). Supervisors' conceptions of research and the implications for supervisor development.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1360144042000296099. doi: International Journal for Academic Development, Vol. 9, No. 1, May 2004, pp. 85–97 Retrieved from
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1360144042000296099
Åkerlind, G. S. (2008). An academic perspective on research and being a researcher: an integration of the literature.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03075070701794775. doi: Studies in Higher Education, Vol. 33, No. 1, February 2008, pp. 17-31. Retrieved rom:
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/03075070701794775